← Home

The larger vision

One tool. Two learning loops.

ATHENA is built as a double learning loop: a loop for the student, and a loop for the teacher. The student loop is live in this demo. The teacher loop is where ATHENA is heading. This page shows both, honestly labelled.

The double learning loop, as a diagram

The ATHENA double learning loop: a planned teacher loop and a student loop that is live in this demo. Select any part of the diagram to read what it does.
Live in this demoPlanned — the larger vision
TEACHER LOOP · PLANNEDSTUDENT LOOP · LIVEDialogic engagementwith the teacherPLANNEDCalibration(course content andlearning outcomes)IN DEMO: STUDENT-LEDDialogic engagementwith the studentLIVEReasoningmappingLIVEAssessment(collected acrossthe class)PLANNEDTeacherStudent

Dialogic engagement with the student

Live in this demo

ATHENA asks critical questions; the student answers, reframes, and defends. In the demo this is the brainstorm, the guided session, and the sparring chat.

Open thesis preparation

Loop one · Live in this demo

The student loop: dialogue → reasoning map → feedback

A student brings an assignment. ATHENA engages it in dialogue, turns the conversation into a reasoning map, and hands the map back as feedback. Every part of this loop can be tried today.

Dialogue

ATHENA asks critical questions; the student answers, reframes, and defends. Judgment stays with the student.

The thesis path

Reasoning maps

Each conversation becomes a map of claims, assumptions, and objections — the structure of the student’s thinking.

The claim map

Feedback

The map goes back to the student: what the argument rests on, where it is strong, and what it still overlooks.

The argument exercise

Loop two · Planned

The teacher loop: calibration → cohort maps → assessment

In the planned system, the teacher calibrates ATHENA with the course: concepts, core literature, assignments, and learning goals. Students then work through those assignments inside the student loop.

Because every session produces a reasoning map, the maps can be aggregated into cohort maps: one view of how the whole class thinks about a problem. Assessment stops being only a grade at the end — it becomes evidence of reasoning collected along the way, reported back to the teacher in dialogue.

Cohort map · one class, one assignmentPlanned feature · example data

Every student session in the demo already produces a reasoning map. In the planned teacher loop, those maps aggregate into one view of how a class of 23 thinks — before the exam finds out.

  • “Storage cost is the main barrier to offshore wind at grid scale.”

    18 of 23 students

    18 of 23 students treat this as settled. Recent literature treats it as contested — worth a session in class.

  • “Lithium-ion is the default storage choice.”

    14 of 23 students

    An unexamined assumption in 14 reasoning maps. Nobody argues for it; it is simply taken for granted.

  • “Community acceptance affects where storage can be sited.”

    3 of 23 students

    A blind spot: only 3 of 23 students consider it, although two assignments depend on siting.

The teacher sees where the class’s reasoning holds and where it breaks down — and adjusts the next lecture, not just the next grade.

This demo is one turn of the student loop.

Thesis preparation is the first assignment ATHENA runs — chosen because no teacher needs to calibrate it: the student frames the problem themselves. The same loop can run inside any course, calibrated by the teacher’s own concepts, literature, and learning goals.